The United Nations Security Council endorses the American ceasefire plan between Israel and Gaza.

The original proposal by the United States for a ceasefire plan in the Gaza conflict was completely supported by the Security Council.

The suggestions outline a “complete and comprehensive ceasefire” and the release of hostages held by both sides, who are eager to identify them.

Fourteen members of the main Security Council voted in favor, while others, crafted by the United States, abstained from voting.

The agreement stipulates that Israel has accepted the Hamas movement’s ceasefire, and urges Hamas to also agree to it.++++++

This means that the Council joins a number of nations, in addition to the Group of Seven wealthiest nations, in supporting the building of security in three parts revealed by President Joe in a televised statement on May 31st. For this reason, because it now has a consensus calling for a ceasefire.

The proposals submitted by Israel to the United States and its intermediary colleagues Qatar and Egypt, which were delayed from the summary submitted, have not been announced, and it is unclear whether they differ from what the President presented. The Israeli War Cabinet approved Israel’s proposals from three members and has not disclosed them wider. Some extremist ministers have also opposed it. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not directly note whether he supports the building as a major representative.

Approval was given shortly after U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s meeting with senior officials, including previously, in an attempt to garner support for the ceasefire agreement.

Therefore, it must be said, “If you want a ceasefire, pressure Hamas to say yes.”

It will then continue on a tightrope while the United States urges participation in preventing another outbreak of violence in Gaza.

The ceasefire plan in Gaza is set to become a deadly game thereafter.

The group earlier stated its support for parts of the plan and issued a statement on Monday “welcoming” the Security Council’s decision.

Hamas reiterated its demand for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and a complete Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, as well as the exchange of Palestinian prisoners. The group stated that it is prepared to cooperate with mediators and engage in “indirect negotiations.”

Its political leadership in Doha has not officially responded to the proposal yet, according to American and Israeli officials.

The proposal culminates in a major plan to reconstruct Gaza, which has been largely destroyed in the conflict.

The first phase involves hostage and prisoner exchanges as well as a short-term ceasefire.

The second phase includes a “permanent cessation of hostile acts,” as well as a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, according to the draft of the American resolution.

The third phase focuses on long-term prospects for the sector, with a multi-year reconstruction plan for Gaza set to begin.

Monday’s decision comes after 10 days since President Biden announced that Israelis had agreed to the plan.

While Biden presented the peace initiative as an Israeli initiative, the United States also recognizes that the divided ruling coalition in Israel is approaching the plan with hesitation. This extends to outspoken opposition from some right-wing extremist ministers who threaten to bring down the government if the agreement proceeds.

The resignation of former Defense Minister Benny Gantz from the war government on Sunday deepened this sense of instability.

Jeremy Bowen: Netanyahu walks a tightrope as the US pushes for a deal

President Biden’s account on X, formerly Twitter, acknowledged the resolution’s passage. The post stated, “Hamas says it wants a ceasefire.” “This deal is an opportunity to prove they mean it.”

Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the US Ambassador to the United Nations, said, “We voted today for peace.”

UK Ambassador Barbara Woodward described the situation in Gaza as “disastrous,” adding that “the suffering has gone on for far too long.”

Woodward said, “We call on both parties to seize this opportunity and move towards a lasting peace that ensures security and stability for both the Israeli and Palestinian peoples.”

The British Foreign Secretary David Cameron also welcomed the resolution.

In explaining its abstention, Russian Ambassador to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia raised concerns about the clarity of the agreement and whether Israel had truly accepted the plan to end its military operation in Gaza, as stated in the resolution.

“Given the numerous statements issued by Israel regarding extending the war until the complete defeat of Hamas… What exactly did Israel agree to?” Mr. Nebenzia asked.

Despite voting in favor of the resolution, China also expressed its concerns about the text. Its ambassador to the United Nations questioned whether this time would be different from the three previous Security Council resolutions on the conflict, which were not implemented despite being legally binding.

On March 25th, the United Nations Security Council issued a resolution calling for a ceasefire.

While the United States has previously used its veto power against similar measures, stating that such a move would be premature while delicate negotiations were ongoing between Israel and Hamas, it abstained from voting instead of vetoing the March resolution. Netanyahu said at the time that the United States had “abandoned” its previous position linking a ceasefire to the release of hostages.

The conflict began when Hamas attacked southern Israel on October 7th, resulting in the deaths of about 1,200 people and the holding of approximately 251 hostages.

The Ministry of Health, run by Hamas, says that the number of deaths in Gaza has exceeded 37,000 since Israel’s response to its attack.

Back To Top