New Research Connects Talc to Ovarian Cancer and Raises Concerns for J&J

New research published this week provides further evidence supporting the thousands of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson alleging that its talc-based baby powder may have caused ovarian cancer. The study, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, found that applying talc powder to the genitals was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, especially for those who used the product frequently or for long periods of time.

The researchers, affiliated with the National Institutes of Health, based their findings on data from the Sister Study, which enrolled over 50,000 women in the U.S. from 2003 to 2009. Participants, aged between 35 and 74, had a sister diagnosed with breast cancer, putting them at higher risk for breast or ovarian cancer.

A history of lawsuits against J&J regarding their talc-based products dates back to 1999 when a woman claimed her mesothelioma was linked to the use of the baby powder. Subsequent cases involving ovarian cancer or mesothelioma have emerged, with claimants alleging exposure to asbestos in the products.

J&J has consistently denied the presence of asbestos in their talc products and has defended their safety. However, the recent research findings could challenge this stance as legal battles continue, with numerous lawsuits consolidated into a federal case in New Jersey, set for trial this December.

In response to the new analysis, Leigh O’Dell from Beasley Allen Law Firm, representing plaintiffs against J&J, stated that the study supports the position taken by experts. Contrary to this, J&J’s Erik Haas maintained that talcum powder does not cause ovarian cancer, citing overwhelming evidence.

Despite J&J’s efforts to resolve talc-related lawsuits through bankruptcy court, the proposed $6.48 billion settlement was met with skepticism. O’Dell emphasized the need for a fair resolution for the impacted women outside of bankruptcy court.

The study’s focus on the potential harms of talc products, particularly on female genitalia, urged a reevaluation of the use of talcum powder. With J&J discontinuing talc-based baby powder due to declining demand and safety concerns, questions arise regarding the contamination of talc with asbestos and other harmful chemicals.

Debates surrounding the scientific evidence linking talc to ovarian cancer are expected to intensify in the upcoming litigation against J&J. The balance of evidence may shift with the new study’s comprehensive approach compared to previous research.

Further discussions delve into how talc products may have reinforced body shame, promoting unnecessary use for cleanliness and odor reduction in sensitive areas. Scranton from Women’s Voices for the Earth highlighted the misleading marketing tactics that perpetuated the myth of inherent dirtiness and shame associated with genital hygiene.

As the legal battles continue, the impact of talc-based products on women’s health and body image remains a topic of significant debate, shaped by ongoing research, legal proceedings, and public awareness campaigns.

Back To Top