Arizona judge and his lawmaker wife team up to revive 1864 abortion law, only to later join Democrats in repealing it

In a recent pivotal moment in Arizona’s legislative history, Shawnna Bolick, a conservative lawmaker, found herself at the center of a contentious debate regarding the repeal of a 1864 law that prohibited nearly all abortions. While Democrats sought additional support from the right to push the bill forward, Bolick surprised many by sharing her personal experiences with difficult pregnancies, including a miscarriage, and the crucial support she received from her husband, Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick. Despite the initial confusion surrounding her stance, Bolick ultimately voted to repeal the ban, a decision that highlighted the complex and ever-evolving landscape surrounding abortion access in Arizona.

This decision, influenced by personal experiences and political pressures, underscored the challenges faced by Republicans in navigating the delicate issue of abortion during a presidential election year. The intersection of personal beliefs, professional responsibilities, and public scrutiny has put the Bolicks in a difficult position, with both declining interview requests from media outlets.

The couple’s close ties to prominent conservative figures, including U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, have also drawn attention. Thomas, who played a pivotal role in overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022, has long advocated for conservative judicial principles. The Bolicks’ connections to the Thomas family, coupled with their own conservative credentials, have not shielded them from criticism and political challenges.

As Arizona grapples with the aftermath of the abortion repeal vote, calls for accountability and activism have emerged from various quarters. Progressive groups have launched campaigns targeting justices, including Clint Bolick, who voted to reinstate the abortion ban. The upcoming retention election in November will serve as a pivotal moment for voters to hold judicial officials accountable for their decisions.

The political fallout from the abortion repeal vote has implications beyond Arizona’s borders. Democrats have seized on the issue as part of their broader strategy to regain control of the state Legislature. Bolick’s representation of a competitive district makes her a prime target for opponents seeking to capitalize on the controversy surrounding her vote.

As the legal landscape continues to shift, with the prospect of a ballot measure to enshrine abortion access in the state constitution, Arizona faces a period of uncertainty and heightened political tension. The decisions made by lawmakers like Bolick will have far-reaching consequences for the state’s reproductive rights framework and the broader national discourse on abortion policy.

Back To Top