2022 sees Georgia QB Jaden Rashada taking legal action against Florida coach Billy Napier and booster for failed NIL deal.

New Georgia quarterback Jaden Rashada has recently made headlines for filing a lawsuit against Florida coach Billy Napier and a Gators booster over the dissolution of an NIL deal that ultimately led to his decommitment from the school. Rashada, who transferred to Georgia from Arizona State in April, originally signed with Florida in December of 2022 with the promise of an eight-figure NIL deal. However, when this deal fell through, Rashada was released from his letter of intent in January of 2023.

In the lawsuit, Rashada claims that he was defrauded by Florida and alleges that Napier promised his father a partial payment of $1 million at the time of signing. This situation has shed light on the growing concerns surrounding NIL deals in college athletics, with Rashada’s suit being the first known lawsuit regarding NIL deals in college sports.

Booster Hugh Hathcock and his automotive dealership are also named as defendants in the lawsuit. This legal action comes after Florida became the subject of an NCAA investigation regarding Rashada’s recruitment in 2023. The use of NIL deals to entice recruits has become a contentious issue in college sports, as schools are not supposed to use the prospect of NIL deals as a recruiting tool. However, the allure of lucrative NIL deals has quickly become a significant factor in many recruits’ decisions.

Rashada’s journey to Georgia has been filled with twists and turns, including a brief stint at Arizona State before ultimately committing to the Bulldogs. At Georgia, Rashada is expected to serve as a backup to Carson Beck in 2024 before competing for the starting quarterback position in 2025.

Overall, Rashada’s lawsuit against Florida and the ensuing legal battle over NIL deals in college athletics highlight the complexities and challenges that arise in the evolving landscape of college sports. As the first scholar-athlete to take a stand against unethical recruiting practices, Rashada’s case could have far-reaching implications for the future of NIL deals in college athletics.

Back To Top